The Annual


The Annual

Order our print edition and become a HOLO Reader. In addition to our magazine, you’ll get access to everything we publish online for a year.

The HOLO Annual is available in three different tiers. For options and shipping information see below.

Print + Online Edition
  • One boxed copy of the annual print edition
  • Free shipping anywhere in the world
  • Full access to online content
  • Automatic yearly renewal until canceled
Online Edition
  • Full access to online content
  • Automatic yearly renewal until canceled

Studio Edition
  • For classrooms, labs, and studios
  • Five copies of the annual print edition
  • Free shipping anywhere in the world
  • Full access to the online edition for up to 20 users
  • Automatic yearly renewal until canceled
Print Edition

Current Print Edition: 2022/HOLO4
Release Date: Autumn 2022
Dossier: TBA

Please visit the Shop for back issues of HOLO

Print Edition
  • Annual printed 100+ page publication exploring emerging trajectories in art, science, and technology; each issue features deep thematic research and analysis across mediums and formats (essays, surveys, commentary, illustrations, photography, editorial experiments), drawing from a roster of journalists, cultural critics, artists and designers, and specialists from the humanities and sciences
  • Bonus material like zines, kits, posters, and limited edition artworks
  • Free shipping anywhere in the world
Online Edition
  • Encounters: longform interviews and profiles of key artists, designers, researchers, curators, and cultural producers
  • Production Notes: research snippets, B-roll material, and exclusive previews of the print edition and upcoming online features in the making
  • Stream: an aggregation of cultural commentary, scientific research, emerging technologies, and multidisciplinary art and design—curated by team HOLO.
  • Dossiers: a window into key exhibitions, festivals, and residencies through research and conversation—produced in collaboration with guest writers and artists
  • Guest Features: essays, features, and historical research by invited contributors (coming soon)
  • Archive: selected articles and features from past print editions reimagined in a new online format
  • Special Offers: discounts for products available in the HOLO shop and through our collaborators and partners

Terms and conditions:


HOLO magazine is shipped annually via priority mail from our distribution hub in Berlin. Orders are mailed within two weeks of release: shipping within the EU takes 5-10 business days, orders to North America take 2-3 weeks, and shipping to the rest of the world can take 2-5 weeks. Tracking numbers are not available.

Reader Account

Your deliveries of HOLO magazine and reader-only access to are valid as long as you maintain your annual renewal. You will receive an issue of the magazine once per year regardless of the yearly start/renewal date.

Already ordered HOLO 3?

Customers that already have an order of HOLO 3 on file need to activate their Reader Account. HOLO 3 will be shipped in the autumn of 2021 to all orders. To maintain your reader account, access reader-only content, and receive future editions of HOLO magazine (after HOLO 3) you will need to “Upgrade” your account to one of the tiers above.

Cancelations and Refund Policy

You can cancel at any time. If you cancel your reader account your access to reader-only content continues until 365 days have passed since your last payment and you have received a print issue. For refunds, please get in touch with us via our contact page.


Kim Stanley Robinson: “Sci-Fi Authors Are Court Jesters in the Circus of UN Climate Meetings”

“The court jester often says things people need to hear, from angles no one else would think of. Those in power listen for amusement and crazy insight.”
– Sci-fi author Kim Stanley Robinson, on his imagined role and capacity to speak truth to power when he attends the upcoming “combination diplomacy, trade show, and circus” COP26 UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow

Researchers Share Findings That Twitter’s Algorithm Amplifies Right-Wing Content

A team of machine learning researchers including Ferenc Huszár, Sofia Ira Ktena, and Conor O’Brien publish findings that Twitter’s algorithmically ranked home timeline amps up the visibility of right-wing content when compared to the reverse chronological timeline. Analysis of 2020 tweets from America, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Spain, and the UK revealed that in six out of seven of those countries elected officials on the political right received more amplification than those on the left, and that right-leaning news organizations were also amplified. “We hope that by sharing this analysis, we can help spark a productive conversation with the broader research community,” write Twitter’s Rumman Chowdhury and Luca Belli.

“By now, AI is as Ambient as the Internet Itself.”

“By now, AI is as ambient as the internet itself. In the words of the computer scientist Andrew Ng, artificial intelligence is ‘the new electricity.’”
– Author and journalist Sue Halpern, on the prevalence—and human cost—of artificial intelligence. “AI has been used to monitor farmers’ fields, compute credit scores, kill an Iranian nuclear scientist, grade papers, fill prescriptions, diagnose various kinds of cancers, write newspaper articles, buy and sell stocks, and decide which actors to cast in big-budget films in order to maximize the return on investment,” Halpern writes.

New Orleans News Nonprofit Releases Report on the City’s Rapidly Growing Surveillance Apparatus

New Orleans news nonprofit The Lens releases “Neighborhoods Watched: The Rise of Urban Mass Surveillance,” a five-part series on the city’s rapidly growing surveillance apparatus. In obtaining and reviewing thousands of city documents, Michael Isaac Stein, Caroline Sinders, and Winnie Yoe demonstrate how a $40 million public safety plan created a “sprawling, decentralized and constantly changing patchwork of tools” maintained by various departments, agencies, private nonprofits, and law enforcement with little oversight.

Nora N. Khan on (Biased) Predictive Systems and Four More Powerhouse Thinkers Joining the HOLO Annual

“As we struggle to disentangle ourselves from predictive regimes and algorithmic nudging, we need to tackle what prediction means, and has meant, for control and computation.”
HOLO Annual editor Nora N. Khan, on the prompt “powerhouse thinkers” like Leigh Alexander, Mimi Ọnụọha, Suzanne Treister, and Jackie Wang were asked to respond to in the forthcoming issue’s second chapter, Myths of Prediction Over Time

Myths of Prediction

Prompt 2: On Myths of Prediction Over Time

Prediction has always been part of our cultural heritage, and societies find scientific ways to sort and distribute resources based on biased predictive thought.
Shu Lea Cheang, CASANOVA X (still), from 3x3x6 (2019)
As we struggle to disentangle ourselves from predictive regimes and algorithmic nudging, we need to tackle what prediction means, and has meant, for control and computation.
Nora N. Khan is a New York-based writer and critic with bylines in Artforum, Flash Art, and Mousse. She steers the 2021 HOLO Annual as Editorial Lead

The first wave of HOLO Annual contributors—Nicholas Whittaker, Thomas Brett, Elvia Wilk, and Huw Lemmey—swiftly gathered around the “ways of partial knowing.” As these pieces started to roll in, Peli Grietzer and I needed to light a new fire in another clime for more contributors to gather around. Maybe it is endemic to technological debates that we are drawn into intense binaristic divides. But I started to look across to the other side of the art-technological range, across from the ‘ways of partial knowing’ that seem to offer looseness, a space to breathe. Claims to full knowing, full ownership, or full seeing seem, rightly, harder to sustain these days. I’d written the partial knowing prompt in response to the suffocating grip of algorithmic prediction that I spend my days tracking and analyzing, to see how others articulate senses of the impossibility of perfect prediction, of human activity or thought.

But of course, there are many ways that prediction has always been part of our cultural heritage, and societies find scientific ways to sort, predict, and distribute resources based on biased predictive thought. I’ve a soft spot for critical discussion of predictive systems of control and the artists and theorists who analyze them. I’ve looked to thinkers like Simone Browne and Cathy O’Neill and Safiya Noble and artists like Zach Blas and American Artist, most frequently, for their insights on histories of predictive policing, predictive capture, and the deployment of surveillance in service of capture. I was particularly taken by 3x3x6, the Taiwan Pavilion at the 2019 Venice Biennale, created by Shu Lea Cheang, director, media and net art pioneer, and theorist Paul Preciado. (Francesco Tenaglia’s precise interview with both artists in Mousse is a must-read).

In the space, the Palazzo delle Prigioni, the two investigated the history of the building as a prison, and the exceptional prisoners whose racial or sexual or gender nonconformity led to incarceration: Foucault, the Marquis de Sade, Giaconomo Casanova, and a host of trans and queer thinkers throughout history. The work looks at historical regimes and political definitions of sexual and racial conformity, and the methods of tracking and delineating correct and moral bodies over time: the ways myths of prediction have unfolded in different ways throughout history.

I used these photos and this interview as inspiration this last pandemic year, which I largely spent struggling to complete an essay on internalizing the logic of capture for an issue of Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory (with an incredible list of contributions). In their introduction, Marisa Williamson and Kim Bobier, guest-editors, outline the theme Race, Vision, and Surveillance: “As Simone Browne has observed, performances of racializing surveillance ‘reify boundaries, borders, and bodies along racial lines.’ Taking cues from thinkers such as Browne and Donna Haraway, this special issue draws on feminist understandings of sight as a partial, situated, and embodied type of sense-making laden with ableist assumptions to explore how racial politics have structured practices of oversight. How have technologies of race and vision worked together to monitor modes of being-in-the-world? In what ways have bodies performed for and against such governance?”

Our ways of understanding others are speculative and blurry—how is this blur coded and embedded, and what prediction methods that aim to clarify the blur are possible?
Shu Lea Cheang, 3x3x6 (2019), installation view Taiwan Pavilion at the 2019 Venice Biennale
Four powerhouse thinkers were asked to think about the rise in magical thinking around prediction and the capacity of predictive systems to become more ruthless.

The gathering of feminist investigations drew on surveillance studies and critical race theory to theorize responses to the violence of racializing surveillance. Between the theorists in this issue and the impact of 3x3x6, it seemed to me that surveillance-prediction regimes of the present moment must be understood as a repetition of every regime that has come before.

In a way, it turned out that the prompts of ‘partial knowing’ and ‘myths of prediction’ are more linked than opposed: Our ways of understanding others are already quite speculative and blurry; how is this blur coded and embedded, and what prediction methods that aim to clarify the blur, or make the blur more precise, are possible?

Even as we struggle to find ways to disentangle ourselves from predictive regimes and algorithmic nudging, we also need to tackle what prediction means, and has meant, for control, for statistics, for computation. This second prompt includes hazy, fuzzy, and over-determinant methods of prediction and discernment. The future, here, is one entirely shaped by algorithmic notions of how we’ll act, move, and react, based on what we do, say, and choose, now—a mediation of the future based on consumption, feeling, that is subject to change, that is passing.

Four powerhouse thinkers—Leigh Alexander, Mimi Ọnụọha, Suzanne Treister, and Jackie Wang—join the Annual to respond to this prompt, Myths of Prediction Over Time. They were asked to think about the rise in magical thinking around prediction and the capacity of predictive technologies to become more intense as technological systems of prediction become more ruthless, stupid, flattening, and their logic, quite known. They look at the history of predictive ‘technologies’ (scrying and tarot and future-casting) as magic, as enchantment, as mystic logic, as it shapes the narratives we have around computational prediction in the present moment.

Together, they are invited to consider the algorithmic sorting of peoples based on deep historical and social bias; at surveillance and capture of fugitive communities; at prediction of a person’s capacity based on limited and contextless data as an ever political undertaking, or at prediction as they interpret it. They might reflect on the various methods for typing personalities, discerning character, and the creation of systems of control based on these partial predictions. They are further invited to look both at predictive systems embedded in justice systems, or in pseudoscientific tests like Myers-Briggs, for example, embedded in corporate personality tests.

Wang, Ọnụọha, Alexander, and Treister are particularly equipped to think on these systems, having consistently established entire spaces of speculation through their arguments.

Respondents: Leigh Alexander, Mimi Ọnụọha, Suzanne Treister, Jackie Wang
Jackie Wang (US)
Scholar, poet, multimedia artist, and “Carceral Capitalism” author
Leigh Alexander (US)
Author, journalist, speaker, and videogame developer
Suzanne Treister (UK)
Contemporary artist and new media pioneer
Mimi Ọnụọha (US)
Artist, engineer, scholar, and NYU Tisch professor

Jackie Wang wrote the seminal book Carceral Capitalism (2018), a searing book on the racial, economic, political, legal, and technological dimensions of the U.S. carceral state. A chapter titled “This is a Story about Nerds and Cops” is widely circulated and found on syllabi. I met Jackie in 2013 as we were both living in Boston, where she was completing her dissertation at Harvard. She gave a reading in a black leather jacket at EMW Bookstore, a hub for Asian American and diasporic poets, writers, activists. I’ve followed her writing and thinking closely since. Wang is a beloved scholar, abolitionist, poet, multimedia artist, and Assistant Professor of American Studies and Ethnicity at the University of Southern California. In addition to her scholarship, her creative work includes the poetry collection The Sunflower Cast a Spell to Save Us from the Void (2021) and the forthcoming experimental essay collection Alien Daughters Walk Into the Sun.

Mimi Ọnụọha and I met at Eyebeam as research residents in 2016, and our desks were close to one another. One thing I learned about Mimi is that she is phenomenally busy and in high demand. She is an artist, an engineer, a scholar, and a professor. She created the concept and phrase “algorithmic violence.” At the time she was developing research around power dynamics within archives (you should look up her extended artwork, The Library of Missing Datasets, examining power mediated through what is left out of government or state archives).

Ọnụọha, who lives and works in Brooklyn, is a Nigerian-American artist creating work about a world made to fit the form of data. By foregrounding absence and removal, her multimedia practice uses print, code, installation and video to make sense of the power dynamics that result in disenfranchised communities’ different relationships to systems that are digital, cultural, historical, and ecological. Her recent work includes In Absentia, a series of prints that borrow language from research that black sociologist W.E.B. Du Bois conducted in the nineteenth century to address the difficulties he faced and the pitfalls he fell into, and A People’s Guide To AI, a comprehensive beginner’s guide to understanding AI and other data-driven systems, co-created with Diana Nucera.

If you’ve had any contact with videogames or the games industry in the last 15 years, Leigh Alexander needs no introduction. You’ve either played her work or read her stories or watched her Lo-Fi Let’s Plays on YouTube or read her withering and incisive criticism in one of many marquee venues. She is well-known as a speaker, as a writer and narrative designer focused on storytelling systems, digital society and the future. Along with other women writing critically about games, including Jenn Frank, Lana Polansky, and Cara Ellison, I’ve been reading and influenced by her fiction and criticism since 2008.

Alexander won the 2019 award for Best Writing in a Video Game from the esteemed Writers Guild of Great Britain for Reigns: Her Majesty, and her speculative fiction has been published in Slate and The Verge. Her work often draws her ten years as a journalist and critic on games and virtual worlds, and she frequently speaks on narrative design, procedural storytelling, online culture and arts in technology. She is currently designing games about relationships and working as a narrative design consultant for development teams.

Suzanne Treister, our final contributor to this chapter, has been a pioneer in the field of new media since the late 1980s, and works simultaneously across video, the internet, interactive technologies, photography, drawing and watercolour. In 1988 she was making work about video games, in 1992 virtual reality, in 1993 imaginary software and in 1995 she made her first web project and invented a time travelling avatar, Rosalind Brodsky, the subject of an interactive CD-ROM. Often spanning several years, her projects comprise fantastic reinterpretations of given taxonomies and histories, engaging with eccentric narratives and unconventional bodies of research. Recent projects include The Escapist Black Hole Spacetime, Technoshamanic Systems, and Kabbalistic Futurism.

Treister’s work has been included in the 7th Athens Biennale, 16th Istanbul Biennial, 9th Liverpool Biennial, 10th Shanghai Biennale, 8th Montréal Biennale and 13th Biennale of Sydney. Recent solo and group exhibitions have taken place at Schirn Kunsthalle, Frankfurt, Moderna Museet, Stockholm, Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin, Centre Pompidou, Paris, Victoria and Albert Museum, London, and the Institute of Contemporary Art, London, among others. Her 2019 multi-part Serpentine Gallery Digital Commission comprised an artist’s book and an AR work. She is the recipient of the 2018 Collide International Award, organised by CERN, Geneva, in collaboration with FACT UK. Treister lives and works in London and the French Pyrenees.

Stay tuned for more notes on the next two Annual prompts—on mapping outside language, and explainability—and the brilliant contributors on board. Also take note of the first in a series of research transcripts featuring conversation excerpts with our research partner Peli Grietzer about incoming drafts, the frame overall, and, well, all those atlases of AI.

Planetary-Scale Computation Vs the Deep Time of Facts

“The problem with planetary-scale computation is with scale itself. It fails to reckon with what we might call the deep time of facts.”
Peter Polack, designer and UCLA PhD candidate, critiquing Benjamin Bratton’s The Revenge of the Real (2021). Rather than suffering from “impractical applications, ideological criticisms, and a lack of recursive models,” Polack argues that Bratton’s planetary-scale computation doesn’t account for the “historical heterogeneity of facts, their capacity to change unpredictably, and their variations across geographical and cultural contexts.”

Artist Collective RYBN Reflects on Touring Offshore Finance

“Offshore finance pierces reality,” French artist collective RYBN reflects on their Offshore Tours (2018-20) in a Palm editorial. Over two years, the artists mapped 785,000 leaked addresses tied to offshore activity. “Behind each photographed facade hides a hot spot, a gap in the urban landscape connected to elsewhere, a true crossing point to offshore space,” they write. “These addresses are deserted at the very moment of their unveiling, the tracking of offshore finance thus turns into ghost hunting.”